Friday, November 28, 2008

Your Intrepid Explorer Risks Eye and Sanity...

okay, I did a bad thing...

I went over to Glenn Sacks' blog, mainly because it is rude and fallacious to criticize someones position without actually knowing anything about their position. I am not going to link to it, simply because its not hard to find on your own, and because the last thing I need right now is a deluge of some of the people who read those blogs. I am not in the mood to heavily moderate comments to maintain a safe-space.

When I was there, I tried to give it the benefit of the doubt, because as much as I have a serious problem with MRAs, there are inequalities that men face that I am against. I mainly disagree with the source of these inequalities, and the technique for solving them that most MRAs seem to advocate. They want to blame feminism, or feminists, which ends up turning into a fight against the very group of people with the history and experience to solve the inequalities they are being blamed for.

I only managed to really analyze one thing before the whole space started to really bother me, so I will make this a gradual thing. I will start with one, and if I can stomach spending more than a few minutes over there, I may do this again.

An ad that occurred right after the first article:
Discover how she has 'played' you. For the first time ever, a book that tells you exactly how manipulative and deceitful women win against their unsuspecting prey--and there's detailed information about what you can do about it. Read Roy Sheppard and Mary T Cleary's book "Venus: The Dark Side".
An alternate title for this book, when you follow the ad's url, is "That Bitch" (You cannot make this shit up.) It was changed because the authors wanted to reach as many people as possible with their message of "evil conniving" women who victimize "innocent" men. If Mr. Sacks and his movement are not interested in demonizing women, why have an ad for something so flagrantly anti-woman? ETA: Since it came up in the comments, when was the last time you saw a book about abusive men titled "That Asshole"? Even more than that, was it advertised on a site run by gender equality activists?

To be fair, many blog ad programs simply search keywords and post ads that match. We find that on feminists sites as well, a discussion of eating disorders or fat acceptance flanked by diet ads, a discussion of porn or sex-workers rights surrounded by ads for "free" porn sites, discussion of abortion rights bringing up ads for pro-life services. This is why a good deal of feminist bloggers have very limited ads, and tend to stick to ads that they can approve pre-posting. It is possible that this is what is happening here. Make of it what you will.

I am skeptical, mainly because all of the other ads seem directly applicable to the content of the blog.

I have heard a lot of excuses from MRA's about how they aren't anti-woman, they are just anti-feminist, or even how they aren't anti-feminist, just anti-radical misandrist feminists. I personally do not see that distinction being made here.

Keep an eye out for later posts examining the inner-workings of the MRA blogosphere...

6 comments:

  1. I for one cannot stand Sacks or his cult like followers. There are many posts that I have no written simply because I do not want to deal with an influx of those trolls. Unfortunately not linking to then is no guarantee that they will not attack you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:27 PM

    I wouldn’t say the book demonizes all women. It’s about abusive women and advises men on how to deal with them/avoid them... There are plenty of books out there written about abusive men.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ Beste:
    I followed the link for information on the book, and it does indeed demonize anything other than a submissive typically "feminine" woman.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11:50 PM

    Did you actually watch to clip with Mary T Cleary in it? She makes it quite clear that the book is about abusive women.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, and while it may be clear to you, I find it not to be so clear. Difference in perspective. I also find it difficult to believe that it is purely about abusive women when the title is "That Bitch" which is an unnecessary use of dehumanizing language.

    When was the last time you found an ad on a feminist site for a book called "That Dickhead" or "That Asshole" that tried to paint itself as being about abusive men?

    ReplyDelete